Yes.
The more I think about it, the more I realize that immigration is part of our fight in the climate movement. Here’s why I think we need to be actively involved in the immigrant-rights battle that’s going on right now.
In terms of “stopping climate change,” “containing climate change,’ or even “preventing the collapse of civilization as we know it,” we’re fucked. Really fucked. Bill McKibben’s new book, Eaarth, makes that abundantly clear. The title reflects the point that the planet we used to know is gone. McKibben couldn’t possibly be any clearer about the fact that there is no hope of avoiding the collapse of our civilization. What matters at this point is what the collapse will look like and what will come next, and that’s also the scariest part.
When the industrial economy collapses and we move toward a more manual labor based economy, that could be a good opportunity for mass awakening. It could be a chance for our society to collectively say “Maybe trying to meet our emotional needs through material consumption wasn’t a good idea” or “Maybe greed and competition weren’t the best values on which to base our culture and economy.” There will undeniably be extreme hardship and loss of life, but it could reconnect us to our humanity, and a new society more in line with our true values could be build on the ashes of this one.
But history suggests otherwise. While there has never been this kind of collapse on a planetary scale, there have been local precedents. Whether environmentally induced like in Darfur or economically induced like in Germany in 1930, societies have gone into free fall. But rarely have those societies acknowledged that they had it coming due to systemic problems in the way they were living. Much more commonly, a person or group stepped up and said “THOSE people, they are the problem.” Then the scapegoated group and civil liberties were sacrificed in the name of reestablishing order and security.
The scariest thing in our future is not the physical limitations we will face, but who will be blamed and what moral sacrifices will be made in the futile attempt to maintain order. That is why what we are doing is so important. If we go over that edge with a clear focus on climate change, we can acknowledge the true culprit and learn from our parents’ mistakes. But without that focus, we are susceptible to any interpretation. Just as climate change is already here, the battle for how we will deal with it is already here as well.
The current immigration debate did not emerge out of a vacuum, and was not nearly as heated just three years ago. But then gas prices shot up because we are running out of oil. As the cheap and easily accessible oil peaked, supplies ran short and speculators panicked. While the oil driven economy at large suffered, the greatest impact was on the housing market since the glut of suburban houses with 90 minute commutes were suddenly less attractive. So the economy tanked and unemployment skyrocketed. Since the root issue of basing our economy on a rapidly depleting resource is uncomfortable to deal with, the right wing demagogues had no trouble selling their argument that “THOSE people stole your jobs.” Hence the front page quote from Archie Archuleta last week about the current atmosphere being more hateful toward immigrants than any point in his 60 years of dealing with immigration issues. This is a harbinger of things to come. The current battleground of hatred is immigration, and it matters who wins. If hatred wins the day today, we face a much darker tomorrow.
If our groups stay out of this issue, we implicitly support the notion that this is just about immigrants. But the hatred toward immigrants is not just an alternative to compassion toward immigrants; it is also an alternative to a rational discussion of the real problems with our economy and society. Xenophobia is the alternative to honest introspection. The climate movement needs to be actively standing up for that voice of honest introspection. We need that introspection now, and we’re really going to need it down the road.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Tim, you’re playing the pawn for big business (who loves that cheap immigrant labor).
History indicates that once immigrants are integrated into society, they stop being cheap labor. The “illegal” label suppresses the value of their labor, which is why corporations are pretty pleased with the status quo. Besides, corporations don’t have to respect borders and can take the jobs to wherever the cheap labor is.
I’ve made it pretty clear just about every time I open my mouth that we need to take power away from big business. I don’t think that goal is incompatible with treating immigrants as humans.
Thanks for the thoughtful article Chris.
Hey Spud,
Big business and it’s free trade policies (NAFTA) and climate change cause both migration and the race to the bottom of environmental protection, human rights and economic justice. Big business profits both from the policies that displace people and then from the low wages that they can get away with paying immigrant workers.
Our only chance is to make common cause with folks most impacted-across borders and those pushed to migrate–to take on the transnational corporation who are the real illegal immigrants (they cross borders and violate our communities and environment in the US and abroad.) Not making common cause with immigrant communities allows big business to divide and conquer us. Climate change is going to create hundreds of millions of climate refugees that need to be our allies. We also have much to learn from the better organized movements in the global south and the more sustainable practices where many migrants come from.
It’s also important to be aware that pro-big business right wing white supremacists are consciously trying to split the environmental movement over immigration issues. Says Tarso Ramos, executive director of Political Research Associates, a Massachusetts organization that has long monitored the American radical right, “John Tanton and the anti-immigration network he built have been greenwashing their racist agenda for far too long. These folks haven’t done a thing to reduce American consumption rates, constrain extractive industries or hold polluters accountable. Yet they’re working overtime to convince actual environmentalists to do their dirty work — blaming immigrants for environmental degradation.”
http://www.alternet.org/story/147655/
I think we are most effective if we make common cause with immigrant communities and the movements around the world to stop the causes of forced migration– anti-environmental corporate “free” trade policies and climate change and other ecological crisis.